XC7A200T vs XC7K325T
A comparison of the AMD Artix-7 XC7A200T and the AMD Kintex-7 XC7K325T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| XC7A200T | XC7K325T | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | AMD Artix-7 | AMD Kintex-7 |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 215,360 | 326,080 |
| LUTs as published | 134,600 LUT6 | 203,800 LUT6 |
| Vendor logic figure | 215,360 LC | 326,080 LC |
| DSP | 740 DSP slices | 840 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 12.8 Mb | 15.6 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 500 | 500 |
| Transceivers | 16 × GTP 6.6 Gb/s | 16 × GTX 12.5 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen2 | Gen2 |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 4 | 4 |
| Design tool | AMD Vivado | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
The XC7K325T has about 51% more logic capacity (326K vs 215K LUT4 equivalents).
For arithmetic, the XC7K325T has 840 DSP slices against 740 DSP slices on the XC7A200T.
The XC7K325T has more on-chip memory (15.6 Mb vs 12.8 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 16 at up to 6.6 Gb/s on the XC7A200T and 16 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the XC7K325T.
The XC7A200T is designed with AMD Vivado and the XC7K325T with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XC7A200T (Artix-7) and XC7K325T (Kintex-7).