FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

XC7K410T vs XCKU5P

A comparison of the AMD Kintex-7 XC7K410T and the AMD Kintex UltraScale+ XCKU5P using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

XC7K410TXCKU5P
Vendor / familyAMD Kintex-7AMD Kintex UltraScale+
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)406,720347,200
LUTs as published254,200 LUT6217,000 LUT6
Vendor logic figure406,720 LC475,000 SLC
DSP1,540 DSP slices1,824 DSP slices
Block RAM27.9 Mb16.9 Mb
Large RAM—18 Mb
Max. user I/O500304
Transceivers16 × GTX 12.5 Gb/s16 × GTY 32.75 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen2Gen3 x16
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm16 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages44
Design toolAMD VivadoAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The XC7K410T has about 17% more logic capacity (407K vs 347K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the XCKU5P has 1,824 DSP slices against 1,540 DSP slices on the XC7K410T.

The XCKU5P has more on-chip memory (34.9 Mb vs 27.9 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 16 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the XC7K410T and 16 at up to 32.75 Gb/s on the XCKU5P.

The XC7K410T is designed with AMD Vivado and the XCKU5P with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XC7K410T (Kintex-7) and XCKU5P (Kintex UltraScale+).