FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

XC7VX415T vs XCKU11P

A comparison of the AMD Virtex-7 XC7VX415T and the AMD Kintex UltraScale+ XCKU11P using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

XC7VX415TXCKU11P
Vendor / familyAMD Virtex-7AMD Kintex UltraScale+
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)412,160478,400
LUTs as published257,600 LUT6299,000 LUT6
Vendor logic figure412,160 LC653,000 SLC
DSP2,160 DSP slices2,928 DSP slices
Block RAM30.9 Mb21.1 Mb
Large RAM—22.5 Mb
Max. user I/O600512
Transceivers48 × GTH 13.1 Gb/s32 × GTH 16.3 Gb/s, 20 × GTY 32.75 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3Gen3 x16
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm16 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages33
Design toolAMD VivadoAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The XCKU11P has about 16% more logic capacity (478K vs 412K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the XCKU11P has 2,928 DSP slices against 2,160 DSP slices on the XC7VX415T.

The XCKU11P has more on-chip memory (43.6 Mb vs 30.9 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 48 at up to 13.1 Gb/s on the XC7VX415T and 52 at up to 32.75 Gb/s on the XCKU11P.

The XC7VX415T is designed with AMD Vivado and the XCKU11P with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XC7VX415T (Virtex-7) and XCKU11P (Kintex UltraScale+).