FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

XC7VX690T vs XCKU11P

A comparison of the AMD Virtex-7 XC7VX690T and the AMD Kintex UltraScale+ XCKU11P using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

XC7VX690TXCKU11P
Vendor / familyAMD Virtex-7AMD Kintex UltraScale+
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)693,120478,400
LUTs as published433,200 LUT6299,000 LUT6
Vendor logic figure693,120 LC653,000 SLC
DSP3,600 DSP slices2,928 DSP slices
Block RAM51.7 Mb21.1 Mb
Large RAM—22.5 Mb
Max. user I/O1,000512
Transceivers80 × GTH 13.1 Gb/s32 × GTH 16.3 Gb/s, 20 × GTY 32.75 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3Gen3 x16
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm16 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages63
Design toolAMD VivadoAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The XC7VX690T has about 45% more logic capacity (693K vs 478K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the XC7VX690T has 3,600 DSP slices against 2,928 DSP slices on the XCKU11P.

The XC7VX690T has more on-chip memory (51.7 Mb vs 43.6 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 80 at up to 13.1 Gb/s on the XC7VX690T and 52 at up to 32.75 Gb/s on the XCKU11P.

The XC7VX690T is designed with AMD Vivado and the XCKU11P with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XC7VX690T (Virtex-7) and XCKU11P (Kintex UltraScale+).