FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

10AT090 vs XC7VH870T

A comparison of the Altera Arria 10 10AT090 and the AMD Virtex-7 XC7VH870T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

10AT090XC7VH870T
Vendor / familyAltera Arria 10AMD Virtex-7
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)679,240876,160
LUTs as published339,620 ALMs547,600 LUT6
Vendor logic figure1,180,000 LE876,160 LC
DSP1,518 variable-precision DSP blocks2,520 DSP slices
Block RAM47.3 Mb49.6 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O624300
Transceivers72 × XCVR 17.4 Gb/s, 6 × XCVR 25.78 Gb/s72 × GTH 13.1 Gb/s, 16 × GTZ 28.05 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3 x8Gen3
Hard processorNoneNone
Process20 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages11
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The XC7VH870T has about 29% more logic capacity (876K vs 679K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the 10AT090 is built from ALMs and the XC7VH870T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (340K vs 548K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the XC7VH870T has 2,520 DSP slices against 1,518 variable-precision DSP blocks on the 10AT090.

Both have transceivers: 78 at up to 25.78 Gb/s on the 10AT090 and 88 at up to 28.05 Gb/s on the XC7VH870T.

The 10AT090 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XC7VH870T with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 10AT090 (Arria 10) and XC7VH870T (Virtex-7).