FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

10AT115 vs XC7VH580T

A comparison of the Altera Arria 10 10AT115 and the AMD Virtex-7 XC7VH580T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

10AT115XC7VH580T
Vendor / familyAltera Arria 10AMD Virtex-7
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)854,400580,480
LUTs as published427,200 ALMs362,800 LUT6
Vendor logic figure1,506,000 LE580,480 LC
DSP1,518 variable-precision DSP blocks1,680 DSP slices
Block RAM53 Mb33 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O624600
Transceivers72 × XCVR 17.4 Gb/s, 6 × XCVR 25.78 Gb/s48 × GTH 13.1 Gb/s, 8 × GTZ 28.05 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3 x8Gen3
Hard processorNoneNone
Process20 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages12
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The 10AT115 has about 47% more logic capacity (854K vs 580K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the 10AT115 is built from ALMs and the XC7VH580T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (427K vs 363K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the XC7VH580T has 1,680 DSP slices against 1,518 variable-precision DSP blocks on the 10AT115.

The 10AT115 has more on-chip memory (53 Mb vs 33 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 78 at up to 25.78 Gb/s on the 10AT115 and 56 at up to 28.05 Gb/s on the XC7VH580T.

The 10AT115 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XC7VH580T with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 10AT115 (Arria 10) and XC7VH580T (Virtex-7).