FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

10AT115 vs XC7VH870T

A comparison of the Altera Arria 10 10AT115 and the AMD Virtex-7 XC7VH870T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

10AT115XC7VH870T
Vendor / familyAltera Arria 10AMD Virtex-7
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)854,400876,160
LUTs as published427,200 ALMs547,600 LUT6
Vendor logic figure1,506,000 LE876,160 LC
DSP1,518 variable-precision DSP blocks2,520 DSP slices
Block RAM53 Mb49.6 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O624300
Transceivers72 × XCVR 17.4 Gb/s, 6 × XCVR 25.78 Gb/s72 × GTH 13.1 Gb/s, 16 × GTZ 28.05 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3 x8Gen3
Hard processorNoneNone
Process20 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages11
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 854K and 876K LUT4 equivalents.

They use different logic architectures: the 10AT115 is built from ALMs and the XC7VH870T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (427K vs 548K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the XC7VH870T has 2,520 DSP slices against 1,518 variable-precision DSP blocks on the 10AT115.

Both have transceivers: 78 at up to 25.78 Gb/s on the 10AT115 and 88 at up to 28.05 Gb/s on the XC7VH870T.

The 10AT115 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XC7VH870T with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 10AT115 (Arria 10) and XC7VH870T (Virtex-7).