FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

10AX066 vs XC7VH580T

A comparison of the Altera Arria 10 10AX066 and the AMD Virtex-7 XC7VH580T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

10AX066XC7VH580T
Vendor / familyAltera Arria 10AMD Virtex-7
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)501,080580,480
LUTs as published250,540 ALMs362,800 LUT6
Vendor logic figure865,000 LE580,480 LC
DSP1,687 variable-precision DSP blocks1,680 DSP slices
Block RAM41.7 Mb33 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O696600
Transceivers48 × XCVR 17.4 Gb/s48 × GTH 13.1 Gb/s, 8 × GTZ 28.05 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3 x8Gen3
Hard processorNoneNone
Process20 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages22
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The XC7VH580T has about 16% more logic capacity (580K vs 501K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the 10AX066 is built from ALMs and the XC7VH580T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (251K vs 363K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the 10AX066 has 1,687 variable-precision DSP blocks against 1,680 DSP slices on the XC7VH580T.

The 10AX066 has more on-chip memory (41.7 Mb vs 33 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 48 at up to 17.4 Gb/s on the 10AX066 and 56 at up to 28.05 Gb/s on the XC7VH580T.

The 10AX066 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XC7VH580T with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 10AX066 (Arria 10) and XC7VH580T (Virtex-7).