FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

10AX090 vs XC7VH580T

A comparison of the Altera Arria 10 10AX090 and the AMD Virtex-7 XC7VH580T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

10AX090XC7VH580T
Vendor / familyAltera Arria 10AMD Virtex-7
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)679,240580,480
LUTs as published339,620 ALMs362,800 LUT6
Vendor logic figure1,180,000 LE580,480 LC
DSP1,518 variable-precision DSP blocks1,680 DSP slices
Block RAM47.3 Mb33 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O768600
Transceivers96 × XCVR 17.4 Gb/s48 × GTH 13.1 Gb/s, 8 × GTZ 28.05 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3 x8Gen3
Hard processorNoneNone
Process20 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages32
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The 10AX090 has about 17% more logic capacity (679K vs 580K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the 10AX090 is built from ALMs and the XC7VH580T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (340K vs 363K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the XC7VH580T has 1,680 DSP slices against 1,518 variable-precision DSP blocks on the 10AX090.

The 10AX090 has more on-chip memory (47.3 Mb vs 33 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 96 at up to 17.4 Gb/s on the 10AX090 and 56 at up to 28.05 Gb/s on the XC7VH580T.

The 10AX090 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XC7VH580T with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 10AX090 (Arria 10) and XC7VH580T (Virtex-7).