FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

5CEA2 vs LFMXO5-25

A comparison of the Altera Cyclone V 5CEA2 and the Lattice MachXO5-NX LFMXO5-25 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

5CEA2LFMXO5-25
Vendor / familyAltera Cyclone VLattice MachXO5-NX
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)18,86022,500
LUTs as published9,430 ALMs22,500 LUT4
Vendor logic figure25,000 LE27,000 LC
DSP25 variable-precision DSP blocks20 18×18 multipliers
Block RAM1.7 Mb1.4 Mb
Large RAM—0.5 Mb
Max. user I/O224305
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMInternal flash
Packages52
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeLattice Radiant

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The LFMXO5-25 has about 19% more logic capacity (22.5K vs 18.9K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the 5CEA2 is built from ALMs and the LFMXO5-25 from LUT4, so the raw LUT counts (9.4K vs 22.5K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the 5CEA2 has 25 variable-precision DSP blocks against 20 18×18 multipliers on the LFMXO5-25.

Configuration memory: sram on the 5CEA2, internal flash on the LFMXO5-25.

The 5CEA2 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the LFMXO5-25 with Lattice Radiant.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 5CEA2 (Cyclone V) and LFMXO5-25 (MachXO5-NX).