FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

5CEA4 vs LIFCL-40

A comparison of the Altera Cyclone V 5CEA4 and the Lattice CrossLink-NX LIFCL-40 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

5CEA4LIFCL-40
Vendor / familyAltera Cyclone VLattice CrossLink-NX
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)36,96032,500
LUTs as published18,480 ALMs32,500 LUT4
Vendor logic figure49,000 LE39,000 LC
DSP66 variable-precision DSP blocks56 18×18 multipliers
Block RAM3 Mb1.5 Mb
Large RAM—1 Mb
Max. user I/O224191
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneGen2
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages55
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeLattice Radiant

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The 5CEA4 has about 14% more logic capacity (37K vs 32.5K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the 5CEA4 is built from ALMs and the LIFCL-40 from LUT4, so the raw LUT counts (18.5K vs 32.5K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the 5CEA4 has 66 variable-precision DSP blocks against 56 18×18 multipliers on the LIFCL-40.

The 5CEA4 has more on-chip memory (3 Mb vs 2.5 Mb).

The 5CEA4 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the LIFCL-40 with Lattice Radiant.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 5CEA4 (Cyclone V) and LIFCL-40 (CrossLink-NX).