FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

5CGTD5 vs XC7A75T

A comparison of the Altera Cyclone V 5CGTD5 and the AMD Artix-7 XC7A75T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

5CGTD5XC7A75T
Vendor / familyAltera Cyclone VAMD Artix-7
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)58,16075,520
LUTs as published29,080 ALMs47,200 LUT6
Vendor logic figure77,000 LE75,520 LC
DSP150 variable-precision DSP blocks180 DSP slices
Block RAM4.4 Mb3.7 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O336300
Transceivers6 × XCVR 6.144 Gb/s8 × GTP 6.6 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen2Gen2
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages54
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The XC7A75T has about 30% more logic capacity (75.5K vs 58.2K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the 5CGTD5 is built from ALMs and the XC7A75T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (29.1K vs 47.2K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the XC7A75T has 180 DSP slices against 150 variable-precision DSP blocks on the 5CGTD5.

The 5CGTD5 has more on-chip memory (4.4 Mb vs 3.7 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 6 at up to 6.144 Gb/s on the 5CGTD5 and 8 at up to 6.6 Gb/s on the XC7A75T.

The 5CGTD5 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XC7A75T with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 5CGTD5 (Cyclone V) and XC7A75T (Artix-7).