FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

5CGXC3 vs EP4CGX30

A comparison of the Altera Cyclone V 5CGXC3 and the Altera Cyclone IV EP4CGX30 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

5CGXC3EP4CGX30
Vendor / familyAltera Cyclone VAltera Cyclone IV
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)26,92029,000
LUTs as published13,460 ALMs29,000 LUT4
Vendor logic figure36,000 LE29,000 LE
DSP57 variable-precision DSP blocks80 18×18 multipliers
Block RAM1.3 Mb1.1 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O208290
Transceivers3 × XCVR 3.125 Gb/s4 × XCVR 3.125 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen1Gen2
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm60 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages33
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAltera Quartus Prime

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The EP4CGX30 has about 8% more logic capacity (29K vs 26.9K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the 5CGXC3 is built from ALMs and the EP4CGX30 from LUT4, so the raw LUT counts (13.5K vs 29K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the EP4CGX30 has 80 18×18 multipliers against 57 variable-precision DSP blocks on the 5CGXC3.

The 5CGXC3 has more on-chip memory (1.3 Mb vs 1.1 Mb).

The 5CGXC3 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the EP4CGX30 with Altera Quartus Prime.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 5CGXC3 (Cyclone V) and EP4CGX30 (Cyclone IV).