FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

5CGXC3 vs XC7A15T

A comparison of the Altera Cyclone V 5CGXC3 and the AMD Artix-7 XC7A15T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

5CGXC3XC7A15T
Vendor / familyAltera Cyclone VAMD Artix-7
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)26,92016,640
LUTs as published13,460 ALMs10,400 LUT6
Vendor logic figure36,000 LE16,640 LC
DSP57 variable-precision DSP blocks45 DSP slices
Block RAM1.3 Mb0.9 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O208250
Transceivers3 × XCVR 3.125 Gb/s4 × GTP 6.6 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen1Gen2
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages35
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The 5CGXC3 has about 62% more logic capacity (26.9K vs 16.6K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the 5CGXC3 is built from ALMs and the XC7A15T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (13.5K vs 10.4K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the 5CGXC3 has 57 variable-precision DSP blocks against 45 DSP slices on the XC7A15T.

The 5CGXC3 has more on-chip memory (1.3 Mb vs 0.9 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 3 at up to 3.125 Gb/s on the 5CGXC3 and 4 at up to 6.6 Gb/s on the XC7A15T.

The 5CGXC3 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XC7A15T with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 5CGXC3 (Cyclone V) and XC7A15T (Artix-7).