FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

5CSEA6 vs XCZU1EG

A comparison of the Altera Cyclone V 5CSEA6 and the AMD Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC XCZU1EG using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

5CSEA6XCZU1EG
Vendor / familyAltera Cyclone VAMD Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)83,82059,200
LUTs as published41,910 ALMs37,000 LUT6
Vendor logic figure110,000 LE81,000 SLC
DSP112 variable-precision DSP blocks216 DSP slices
Block RAM5.4 Mb3.8 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O288180
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processor2× Arm Cortex-A94× Arm Cortex-A53
Process28 nm16 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages34
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The 5CSEA6 has about 42% more logic capacity (83.8K vs 59.2K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the 5CSEA6 is built from ALMs and the XCZU1EG from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (41.9K vs 37K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the XCZU1EG has 216 DSP slices against 112 variable-precision DSP blocks on the 5CSEA6.

The 5CSEA6 has more on-chip memory (5.4 Mb vs 3.8 Mb).

The 5CSEA6 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XCZU1EG with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 5CSEA6 (Cyclone V) and XCZU1EG (Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC).