A3C 025 vs XC7Z007S
A comparison of the Altera Agilex 3 A3C 025 and the AMD Zynq 7000 XC7Z007S using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| A3C 025 | XC7Z007S | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Altera Agilex 3 | AMD Zynq 7000 |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 17,000 | 23,040 |
| LUTs as published | 8,500 ALMs | 14,400 LUT6 |
| Vendor logic figure | 25,075 LE | 23,000 LC |
| DSP | 34 variable-precision DSP blocks | 66 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 1.3 Mb | 1.8 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 256 | 100 |
| Transceivers | None | None |
| Hard PCI Express | None | None |
| Hard processor | 2× Arm Cortex-A55 (optional) | 1× Arm Cortex-A9 |
| Process | Intel 7 | 28 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 3 | 2 |
| Design tool | Altera Quartus Prime | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
The XC7Z007S has about 36% more logic capacity (23K vs 17K LUT4 equivalents).
They use different logic architectures: the A3C 025 is built from ALMs and the XC7Z007S from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (8.5K vs 14.4K) are not directly comparable.
For arithmetic, the XC7Z007S has 66 DSP slices against 34 variable-precision DSP blocks on the A3C 025.
The XC7Z007S has more on-chip memory (1.8 Mb vs 1.3 Mb).
The A3C 025 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XC7Z007S with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: A3C 025 (Agilex 3) and XC7Z007S (Zynq 7000).