FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

A3C 135 vs MPFS095T

A comparison of the Altera Agilex 3 A3C 135 and the Microchip PolarFire SoC MPFS095T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

A3C 135MPFS095T
Vendor / familyAltera Agilex 3Microchip PolarFire SoC
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)91,60093,000
LUTs as published45,800 ALMs93,000 LUT4
Vendor logic figure135,110 LE93,000 LE
DSP184 variable-precision DSP blocks292 18×18 math blocks (MACC)
Block RAM6.9 Mb6 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O392276
Transceivers4 × XCVR 12.5 Gb/s4 × SERDES 12.5 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3 x4Gen2 x4
Hard processor2× Arm Cortex-A55 (optional)4× RISC-V (RV64GC U54)
ProcessIntel 728 nm
Configuration memorySRAMNon-volatile (SONOS flash)
Packages34
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeMicrochip Libero SoC

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 91.6K and 93K LUT4 equivalents.

They use different logic architectures: the A3C 135 is built from ALMs and the MPFS095T from LUT4, so the raw LUT counts (45.8K vs 93K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the MPFS095T has 292 18×18 math blocks (MACC) against 184 variable-precision DSP blocks on the A3C 135.

The A3C 135 has more on-chip memory (6.9 Mb vs 6 Mb).

Configuration memory: sram on the A3C 135, non-volatile (sonos flash) on the MPFS095T.

The A3C 135 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the MPFS095T with Microchip Libero SoC.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: A3C 135 (Agilex 3) and MPFS095T (PolarFire SoC).