FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

A5D 160 vs AGF 014

A comparison of the Altera Agilex 5 D-Series A5D 160 and the Altera Agilex 7 F-Series AGF 014 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

A5D 160AGF 014
Vendor / familyAltera Agilex 5 D-SeriesAltera Agilex 7 F-Series
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)1,096,000974,400
LUTs as published548,000 ALMs487,200 ALMs
Vendor logic figure1,616,600 LE1,437,240 LE
DSP4,968 variable-precision DSP blocks4,510 variable-precision DSP blocks
Block RAM156.4 Mb139 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O888768
Transceivers48 × XCVR 28 Gb/s32 × XCVR 58 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen4 x4, Gen4 x8None
Hard processor4× Arm Cortex-A76 + Cortex-A55 (optional)4× Arm Cortex-A53 (optional)
ProcessIntel 7Intel 7
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages03
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAltera Quartus Prime

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The A5D 160 has about 12% more logic capacity (1096K vs 974K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the A5D 160 has 4,968 variable-precision DSP blocks against 4,510 variable-precision DSP blocks on the AGF 014.

The A5D 160 has more on-chip memory (156.4 Mb vs 139 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 48 at up to 28 Gb/s on the A5D 160 and 32 at up to 58 Gb/s on the AGF 014.

The A5D 160 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the AGF 014 with Altera Quartus Prime.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: A5D 160 (Agilex 5 D-Series) and AGF 014 (Agilex 7 F-Series).