FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

GW1N-2 vs iCE40LM4K

A comparison of the Gowin LittleBee GW1N-2 and the Lattice iCE40 LP/HX/LM iCE40LM4K using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

GW1N-2iCE40LM4K
Vendor / familyGowin LittleBeeLattice iCE40 LP/HX/LM
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)2,3043,520
LUTs as published2,304 LUT43,520 LUT4
Vendor logic figure— LC3,520 LC
DSP— 18×18 multipliers— 16×16 MAC blocks
Block RAM0.1 Mb0.1 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O12539
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process55 nm40 nm
Configuration memoryEmbedded flashNVCM or SRAM
Packages193
Design toolGowin EDALattice iCEcube2

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The iCE40LM4K has about 53% more logic capacity (3.5K vs 2.3K LUT4 equivalents).

The iCE40LM4K has more on-chip memory (0.1 Mb vs 0.1 Mb).

Configuration memory: embedded flash on the GW1N-2, nvcm or sram on the iCE40LM4K.

The GW1N-2 is designed with Gowin EDA and the iCE40LM4K with Lattice iCEcube2.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: GW1N-2 (LittleBee) and iCE40LM4K (iCE40 LP/HX/LM).