GW1N-2 vs LCMXO2-2000
A comparison of the Gowin LittleBee GW1N-2 and the Lattice MachXO2 LCMXO2-2000 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| GW1N-2 | LCMXO2-2000 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Gowin LittleBee | Lattice MachXO2 |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 2,304 | 2,112 |
| LUTs as published | 2,304 LUT4 | 2,112 LUT4 |
| Vendor logic figure | — LC | — LC |
| DSP | — 18×18 multipliers | — 18×18 multipliers |
| Block RAM | 0.1 Mb | 0.1 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 125 | 206 |
| Transceivers | None | None |
| Hard PCI Express | None | None |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 55 nm | 65 nm |
| Configuration memory | Embedded flash | Internal flash |
| Packages | 19 | 6 |
| Design tool | Gowin EDA | Lattice Diamond |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
The GW1N-2 has about 9% more logic capacity (2.3K vs 2.1K LUT4 equivalents).
Configuration memory: embedded flash on the GW1N-2, internal flash on the LCMXO2-2000.
The GW1N-2 is designed with Gowin EDA and the LCMXO2-2000 with Lattice Diamond.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: GW1N-2 (LittleBee) and LCMXO2-2000 (MachXO2).