GW1N-2 vs LFMXO4D-040
A comparison of the Gowin LittleBee GW1N-2 and the Lattice MachXO4 LFMXO4D-040 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| GW1N-2 | LFMXO4D-040 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Gowin LittleBee | Lattice MachXO4 |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 2,304 | 3,000 |
| LUTs as published | 2,304 LUT4 | 3,000 LUT4 |
| Vendor logic figure | — LC | 3,600 LC |
| DSP | — 18×18 multipliers | — 18×18 multipliers |
| Block RAM | 0.1 Mb | 0.1 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 125 | 204 |
| Transceivers | None | None |
| Hard PCI Express | None | None |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 55 nm | — |
| Configuration memory | Embedded flash | Internal flash |
| Packages | 19 | 5 |
| Design tool | Gowin EDA | Lattice Radiant |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
The LFMXO4D-040 has about 30% more logic capacity (3K vs 2.3K LUT4 equivalents).
The LFMXO4D-040 has more on-chip memory (0.1 Mb vs 0.1 Mb).
Configuration memory: embedded flash on the GW1N-2, internal flash on the LFMXO4D-040.
The GW1N-2 is designed with Gowin EDA and the LFMXO4D-040 with Lattice Radiant.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: GW1N-2 (LittleBee) and LFMXO4D-040 (MachXO4).