FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

GW3A-20 vs LIFCL-40

A comparison of the Gowin Arora III GW3A-20 and the Lattice CrossLink-NX LIFCL-40 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

GW3A-20LIFCL-40
Vendor / familyGowin Arora IIILattice CrossLink-NX
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)23,04032,500
LUTs as published23,040 LUT432,500 LUT4
Vendor logic figure— LC39,000 LC
DSP52 DSP blocks56 18×18 multipliers
Block RAM2.1 Mb1.5 Mb
Large RAM—1 Mb
Max. user I/O238191
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneGen2
Hard processorNoneNone
Process—28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages65
Design toolGowin EDALattice Radiant

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The LIFCL-40 has about 41% more logic capacity (32.5K vs 23K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the LIFCL-40 has 56 18×18 multipliers against 52 DSP blocks on the GW3A-20.

The LIFCL-40 has more on-chip memory (2.5 Mb vs 2.1 Mb).

The GW3A-20 is designed with Gowin EDA and the LIFCL-40 with Lattice Radiant.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: GW3A-20 (Arora III) and LIFCL-40 (CrossLink-NX).