GW5AT-60 vs XC7A50T
A comparison of the Gowin Arora V GW5AT-60 and the AMD Artix-7 XC7A50T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| GW5AT-60 | XC7A50T | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Gowin Arora V | AMD Artix-7 |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 59,904 | 52,160 |
| LUTs as published | 59,904 LUT4 | 32,600 LUT6 |
| Vendor logic figure | — LC | 52,160 LC |
| DSP | 118 27×18 DSP blocks | 120 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 2.1 Mb | 2.6 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 320 | 250 |
| Transceivers | 4 × SERDES 12.5 Gb/s | 4 × GTP 6.6 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen3 x4 | Gen2 |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 7 | 5 |
| Design tool | Gowin EDA | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
The GW5AT-60 has about 15% more logic capacity (59.9K vs 52.2K LUT4 equivalents).
They use different logic architectures: the GW5AT-60 is built from LUT4 and the XC7A50T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (59.9K vs 32.6K) are not directly comparable.
For arithmetic, the XC7A50T has 120 DSP slices against 118 27×18 DSP blocks on the GW5AT-60.
The XC7A50T has more on-chip memory (2.6 Mb vs 2.1 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 4 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the GW5AT-60 and 4 at up to 6.6 Gb/s on the XC7A50T.
The GW5AT-60 is designed with Gowin EDA and the XC7A50T with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: GW5AT-60 (Arora V) and XC7A50T (Artix-7).