GW5AT-75 vs XCAU10P
A comparison of the Gowin Arora V GW5AT-75 and the AMD Artix UltraScale+ XCAU10P using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| GW5AT-75 | XCAU10P | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Gowin Arora V | AMD Artix UltraScale+ |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 86,688 | 70,400 |
| LUTs as published | 86,688 LUT4 | 44,000 LUT6 |
| Vendor logic figure | — LC | 96,000 SLC |
| DSP | 213 27×18 DSP blocks | 400 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 4.5 Mb | 3.5 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 312 | 228 |
| Transceivers | 8 × SERDES 12.5 Gb/s | 12 × GTH 16.3 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen3 x8 | Gen4 x8 |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 22 nm | 16 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 0 | 3 |
| Design tool | Gowin EDA | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
The GW5AT-75 has about 23% more logic capacity (86.7K vs 70.4K LUT4 equivalents).
They use different logic architectures: the GW5AT-75 is built from LUT4 and the XCAU10P from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (86.7K vs 44K) are not directly comparable.
For arithmetic, the XCAU10P has 400 DSP slices against 213 27×18 DSP blocks on the GW5AT-75.
The GW5AT-75 has more on-chip memory (4.5 Mb vs 3.5 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 8 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the GW5AT-75 and 12 at up to 16.3 Gb/s on the XCAU10P.
The GW5AT-75 is designed with Gowin EDA and the XCAU10P with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: GW5AT-75 (Arora V) and XCAU10P (Artix UltraScale+).