FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

GX 1100 vs XC7VX980T

A comparison of the Altera Stratix 10 GX/SX GX 1100 and the AMD Virtex-7 XC7VX980T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

GX 1100XC7VX980T
Vendor / familyAltera Stratix 10 GX/SXAMD Virtex-7
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)898,560979,200
LUTs as published449,280 ALMs612,000 LUT6
Vendor logic figure1,325,000 LE979,200 LC
DSP2,592 variable-precision DSP blocks3,600 DSP slices
Block RAM107 Mb52.7 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O688900
Transceivers32 × XCVR 28.3 Gb/s, 16 × XCVR 17.4 Gb/s72 × GTH 13.1 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3 x16Gen3
Hard processorNoneNone
Process14 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages13
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The XC7VX980T has about 9% more logic capacity (979K vs 899K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the GX 1100 is built from ALMs and the XC7VX980T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (449K vs 612K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the XC7VX980T has 3,600 DSP slices against 2,592 variable-precision DSP blocks on the GX 1100.

The GX 1100 has more on-chip memory (107 Mb vs 52.7 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 48 at up to 28.3 Gb/s on the GX 1100 and 72 at up to 13.1 Gb/s on the XC7VX980T.

The GX 1100 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XC7VX980T with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: GX 1100 (Stratix 10 GX/SX) and XC7VX980T (Virtex-7).