LAV-AT-G30 vs XC7A200T
A comparison of the Lattice Avant-G LAV-AT-G30 and the AMD Artix-7 XC7A200T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| LAV-AT-G30 | XC7A200T | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Lattice Avant-G | AMD Artix-7 |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 163,000 | 215,360 |
| LUTs as published | 163,000 LUT4 | 134,600 LUT6 |
| Vendor logic figure | 262,000 LC | 215,360 LC |
| DSP | 700 18×18 multipliers | 740 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 14.4 Mb | 12.8 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 298 | 500 |
| Transceivers | 12 × SERDES 12.5 Gb/s | 16 × GTP 6.6 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | None | Gen2 |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 3 | 4 |
| Design tool | Lattice Radiant | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
The XC7A200T has about 32% more logic capacity (215K vs 163K LUT4 equivalents).
They use different logic architectures: the LAV-AT-G30 is built from LUT4 and the XC7A200T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (163K vs 135K) are not directly comparable.
For arithmetic, the XC7A200T has 740 DSP slices against 700 18×18 multipliers on the LAV-AT-G30.
The LAV-AT-G30 has more on-chip memory (14.4 Mb vs 12.8 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 12 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the LAV-AT-G30 and 16 at up to 6.6 Gb/s on the XC7A200T.
The LAV-AT-G30 is designed with Lattice Radiant and the XC7A200T with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: LAV-AT-G30 (Avant-G) and XC7A200T (Artix-7).