FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

LAV-AT-X70 vs MPF500T

A comparison of the Lattice Avant-X LAV-AT-X70 and the Microchip PolarFire MPF500T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

LAV-AT-X70MPF500T
Vendor / familyLattice Avant-XMicrochip PolarFire
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)397,000481,000
LUTs as published397,000 LUT4481,000 LUT4
Vendor logic figure637,000 LC481,000 LE
DSP1,800 18×18 multipliers1,480 18×18 math blocks (MACC)
Block RAM35.6 Mb29.7 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O554584
Transceivers28 × SERDES 25 Gb/s24 × SERDES 12.7 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressNoneGen2 x4
Hard processorNoneNone
Process16 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMNon-volatile (SONOS flash)
Packages22
Design toolLattice RadiantMicrochip Libero SoC

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The MPF500T has about 21% more logic capacity (481K vs 397K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the LAV-AT-X70 has 1,800 18×18 multipliers against 1,480 18×18 math blocks (MACC) on the MPF500T.

The LAV-AT-X70 has more on-chip memory (35.6 Mb vs 29.7 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 28 at up to 25 Gb/s on the LAV-AT-X70 and 24 at up to 12.7 Gb/s on the MPF500T.

Configuration memory: sram on the LAV-AT-X70, non-volatile (sonos flash) on the MPF500T.

The LAV-AT-X70 is designed with Lattice Radiant and the MPF500T with Microchip Libero SoC.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: LAV-AT-X70 (Avant-X) and MPF500T (PolarFire).