FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

LFD2NX-17 vs XCSU25P

A comparison of the Lattice Certus-NX LFD2NX-17 and the AMD Spartan UltraScale+ XCSU25P using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

LFD2NX-17XCSU25P
Vendor / familyLattice Certus-NXAMD Spartan UltraScale+
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)14,16716,000
LUTs as published14,167 LUT410,000 LUT6
Vendor logic figure17,000 LC22,000 SLC
DSP24 18×18 multipliers36 DSP slices
Block RAM0.4 Mb1.7 Mb
Large RAM2.5 Mb—
Max. user I/O77304
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm16 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages23
Design toolLattice RadiantAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The XCSU25P has about 13% more logic capacity (16K vs 14.2K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the LFD2NX-17 is built from LUT4 and the XCSU25P from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (14.2K vs 10K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the XCSU25P has 36 DSP slices against 24 18×18 multipliers on the LFD2NX-17.

The LFD2NX-17 has more on-chip memory (2.9 Mb vs 1.7 Mb).

The LFD2NX-17 is designed with Lattice Radiant and the XCSU25P with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: LFD2NX-17 (Certus-NX) and XCSU25P (Spartan UltraScale+).