FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

LFD2NX-40 vs LIFCL-40

A comparison of the Lattice Certus-NX LFD2NX-40 and the Lattice CrossLink-NX LIFCL-40 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

LFD2NX-40LIFCL-40
Vendor / familyLattice Certus-NXLattice CrossLink-NX
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)32,50032,500
LUTs as published32,500 LUT432,500 LUT4
Vendor logic figure39,000 LC39,000 LC
DSP56 18×18 multipliers56 18×18 multipliers
Block RAM1.5 Mb1.5 Mb
Large RAM1 Mb1 Mb
Max. user I/O191191
Transceivers1 × SERDES 5 Gb/sNone
Hard PCI ExpressGen2Gen2
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages35
Design toolLattice RadiantLattice Radiant

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 32.5K and 32.5K LUT4 equivalents.

Only the LFD2NX-40 has multi-gigabit transceivers (1 5 Gb/s).

The LFD2NX-40 is designed with Lattice Radiant and the LIFCL-40 with Lattice Radiant.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: LFD2NX-40 (Certus-NX) and LIFCL-40 (CrossLink-NX).