FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

MPF500T vs XC7V585T

A comparison of the Microchip PolarFire MPF500T and the AMD Virtex-7 XC7V585T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

MPF500TXC7V585T
Vendor / familyMicrochip PolarFireAMD Virtex-7
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)481,000582,720
LUTs as published481,000 LUT4364,200 LUT6
Vendor logic figure481,000 LE582,720 LC
DSP1,480 18×18 math blocks (MACC)1,260 DSP slices
Block RAM29.7 Mb27.9 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O584850
Transceivers24 × SERDES 12.7 Gb/s36 × GTX 12.5 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen2 x4Gen2
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm28 nm
Configuration memoryNon-volatile (SONOS flash)SRAM
Packages22
Design toolMicrochip Libero SoCAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The XC7V585T has about 21% more logic capacity (583K vs 481K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the MPF500T is built from LUT4 and the XC7V585T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (481K vs 364K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the MPF500T has 1,480 18×18 math blocks (MACC) against 1,260 DSP slices on the XC7V585T.

Both have transceivers: 24 at up to 12.7 Gb/s on the MPF500T and 36 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the XC7V585T.

Configuration memory: non-volatile (sonos flash) on the MPF500T, sram on the XC7V585T.

The MPF500T is designed with Microchip Libero SoC and the XC7V585T with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: MPF500T (PolarFire) and XC7V585T (Virtex-7).