FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

MPFS160T vs Ti165

A comparison of the Microchip PolarFire SoC MPFS160T and the Efinix Titanium Ti165 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

MPFS160TTi165
Vendor / familyMicrochip PolarFire SoCEfinix Titanium
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)161,000159,610
LUTs as published161,000 LUT4159,610 LUT4
Vendor logic figure161,000 LE162,800 LE
DSP498 18×18 math blocks (MACC)590 DSP blocks
Block RAM10.2 Mb12.1 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O312337
Transceivers8 × SERDES 12.5 Gb/s16 × SERDES 16 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen2 x4Gen4 x4
Hard processor4× RISC-V (RV64GC U54)4× RISC-V RV32
Process28 nm16 nm
Configuration memoryNon-volatile (SONOS flash)SRAM
Packages35
Design toolMicrochip Libero SoCEfinix Efinity

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 161K and 160K LUT4 equivalents.

For arithmetic, the Ti165 has 590 DSP blocks against 498 18×18 math blocks (MACC) on the MPFS160T.

The Ti165 has more on-chip memory (12.1 Mb vs 10.2 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 8 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the MPFS160T and 16 at up to 16 Gb/s on the Ti165.

Configuration memory: non-volatile (sonos flash) on the MPFS160T, sram on the Ti165.

The MPFS160T is designed with Microchip Libero SoC and the Ti165 with Efinix Efinity.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: MPFS160T (PolarFire SoC) and Ti165 (Titanium).