FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

SX 2100 vs Ti2000

A comparison of the Altera Stratix 10 GX/SX SX 2100 and the Efinix Titanium Ti2000 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

SX 2100Ti2000
Vendor / familyAltera Stratix 10 GX/SXEfinix Titanium
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)1,359,3601,974,067
LUTs as published679,680 ALMs— LUT4
Vendor logic figure2,005,000 LE1,974,067 LE
DSP3,744 variable-precision DSP blocks3,808 DSP blocks
Block RAM127 Mb117 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O704480
Transceivers64 × XCVR 28.3 Gb/s, 32 × XCVR 17.4 Gb/s40 × SERDES 25.8 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3 x16Gen4 x8
Hard processor4× Arm Cortex-A534× RISC-V RV64
Process14 nm16 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages22
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeEfinix Efinity

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The Ti2000 has about 45% more logic capacity (1974K vs 1359K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the SX 2100 is built from ALMs and the Ti2000 from LUT4, so the raw LUT counts (680K vs —) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the Ti2000 has 3,808 DSP blocks against 3,744 variable-precision DSP blocks on the SX 2100.

Both have transceivers: 96 at up to 28.3 Gb/s on the SX 2100 and 40 at up to 25.8 Gb/s on the Ti2000.

The SX 2100 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the Ti2000 with Efinix Efinity.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: SX 2100 (Stratix 10 GX/SX) and Ti2000 (Titanium).