T20 vs XCSU25P
A comparison of the Efinix Trion T20 and the AMD Spartan UltraScale+ XCSU25P using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| T20 | XCSU25P | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Efinix Trion | AMD Spartan UltraScale+ |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 19,728 | 16,000 |
| LUTs as published | — LUT4 | 10,000 LUT6 |
| Vendor logic figure | 19,728 LE | 22,000 SLC |
| DSP | 36 18×18 multipliers | 36 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 1 Mb | 1.7 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 230 | 304 |
| Transceivers | None | None |
| Hard PCI Express | None | None |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 40 nm | 16 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 7 | 3 |
| Design tool | Efinix Efinity | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
The T20 has about 23% more logic capacity (19.7K vs 16K LUT4 equivalents).
They use different logic architectures: the T20 is built from LUT4 and the XCSU25P from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (— vs 10K) are not directly comparable.
The XCSU25P has more on-chip memory (1.7 Mb vs 1 Mb).
The T20 is designed with Efinix Efinity and the XCSU25P with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: T20 (Trion) and XCSU25P (Spartan UltraScale+).