Ti135 vs XC7Z030
A comparison of the Efinix Titanium Ti135 and the AMD Zynq 7000 XC7Z030 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| Ti135 | XC7Z030 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Efinix Titanium | AMD Zynq 7000 |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 129,600 | 125,760 |
| LUTs as published | 129,600 LUT4 | 78,600 LUT6 |
| Vendor logic figure | 132,192 LE | 125,000 LC |
| DSP | 480 DSP blocks | 400 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 9.8 Mb | 9.3 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 223 | 250 |
| Transceivers | 8 × SERDES 16 Gb/s | 4 × GTX 12.5 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen4 x4 | Gen2 x4 |
| Hard processor | 4× RISC-V RV32 | 2× Arm Cortex-A9 |
| Process | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 4 | 4 |
| Design tool | Efinix Efinity | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 130K and 126K LUT4 equivalents.
They use different logic architectures: the Ti135 is built from LUT4 and the XC7Z030 from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (130K vs 78.6K) are not directly comparable.
For arithmetic, the Ti135 has 480 DSP blocks against 400 DSP slices on the XC7Z030.
Both have transceivers: 8 at up to 16 Gb/s on the Ti135 and 4 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the XC7Z030.
The Ti135 is designed with Efinix Efinity and the XC7Z030 with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: Ti135 (Titanium) and XC7Z030 (Zynq 7000).