FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

XC7A100T vs XCAU10P

A comparison of the AMD Artix-7 XC7A100T and the AMD Artix UltraScale+ XCAU10P using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

XC7A100TXCAU10P
Vendor / familyAMD Artix-7AMD Artix UltraScale+
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)101,44070,400
LUTs as published63,400 LUT644,000 LUT6
Vendor logic figure101,440 LC96,000 SLC
DSP240 DSP slices400 DSP slices
Block RAM4.7 Mb3.5 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O300228
Transceivers8 × GTP 6.6 Gb/s12 × GTH 16.3 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen2Gen4 x8
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm16 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages43
Design toolAMD VivadoAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The XC7A100T has about 44% more logic capacity (101K vs 70.4K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the XCAU10P has 400 DSP slices against 240 DSP slices on the XC7A100T.

The XC7A100T has more on-chip memory (4.7 Mb vs 3.5 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 8 at up to 6.6 Gb/s on the XC7A100T and 12 at up to 16.3 Gb/s on the XCAU10P.

The XC7A100T is designed with AMD Vivado and the XCAU10P with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XC7A100T (Artix-7) and XCAU10P (Artix UltraScale+).