XC7A200T vs XCAU25P
A comparison of the AMD Artix-7 XC7A200T and the AMD Artix UltraScale+ XCAU25P using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| XC7A200T | XCAU25P | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | AMD Artix-7 | AMD Artix UltraScale+ |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 215,360 | 225,600 |
| LUTs as published | 134,600 LUT6 | 141,000 LUT6 |
| Vendor logic figure | 215,360 LC | 308,000 SLC |
| DSP | 740 DSP slices | 1,200 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 12.8 Mb | 10.5 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 500 | 304 |
| Transceivers | 16 × GTP 6.6 Gb/s | 12 × GTY 32.75 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen2 | Gen3 x8 |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 4 | 2 |
| Design tool | AMD Vivado | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 215K and 226K LUT4 equivalents.
For arithmetic, the XCAU25P has 1,200 DSP slices against 740 DSP slices on the XC7A200T.
The XC7A200T has more on-chip memory (12.8 Mb vs 10.5 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 16 at up to 6.6 Gb/s on the XC7A200T and 12 at up to 32.75 Gb/s on the XCAU25P.
The XC7A200T is designed with AMD Vivado and the XCAU25P with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XC7A200T (Artix-7) and XCAU25P (Artix UltraScale+).