FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

XC7A50T vs XCSU60P

A comparison of the AMD Artix-7 XC7A50T and the AMD Spartan UltraScale+ XCSU60P using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

XC7A50TXCSU60P
Vendor / familyAMD Artix-7AMD Spartan UltraScale+
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)52,16048,000
LUTs as published32,600 LUT630,000 LUT6
Vendor logic figure52,160 LC66,000 SLC
DSP120 DSP slices144 DSP slices
Block RAM2.6 Mb3.4 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O250262
Transceivers4 × GTP 6.6 Gb/s4 × GTH 16.3 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen2Gen4 x4
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm16 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages53
Design toolAMD VivadoAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The XC7A50T has about 9% more logic capacity (52.2K vs 48K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the XCSU60P has 144 DSP slices against 120 DSP slices on the XC7A50T.

The XCSU60P has more on-chip memory (3.4 Mb vs 2.6 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 4 at up to 6.6 Gb/s on the XC7A50T and 4 at up to 16.3 Gb/s on the XCSU60P.

The XC7A50T is designed with AMD Vivado and the XCSU60P with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XC7A50T (Artix-7) and XCSU60P (Spartan UltraScale+).