XC7K160T vs XCAU20P
A comparison of the AMD Kintex-7 XC7K160T and the AMD Artix UltraScale+ XCAU20P using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| XC7K160T | XCAU20P | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | AMD Kintex-7 | AMD Artix UltraScale+ |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 162,240 | 174,400 |
| LUTs as published | 101,400 LUT6 | 109,000 LUT6 |
| Vendor logic figure | 162,240 LC | 238,000 SLC |
| DSP | 600 DSP slices | 900 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 11.4 Mb | 7 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 400 | 228 |
| Transceivers | 8 × GTX 12.5 Gb/s | 12 × GTY 32.75 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen2 | Gen3 x8 |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 3 | 2 |
| Design tool | AMD Vivado | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 162K and 174K LUT4 equivalents.
For arithmetic, the XCAU20P has 900 DSP slices against 600 DSP slices on the XC7K160T.
The XC7K160T has more on-chip memory (11.4 Mb vs 7 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 8 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the XC7K160T and 12 at up to 32.75 Gb/s on the XCAU20P.
The XC7K160T is designed with AMD Vivado and the XCAU20P with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XC7K160T (Kintex-7) and XCAU20P (Artix UltraScale+).