FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

XC7K480T vs XCKU9P

A comparison of the AMD Kintex-7 XC7K480T and the AMD Kintex UltraScale+ XCKU9P using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

XC7K480TXCKU9P
Vendor / familyAMD Kintex-7AMD Kintex UltraScale+
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)477,760438,400
LUTs as published298,600 LUT6274,000 LUT6
Vendor logic figure477,760 LC600,000 SLC
DSP1,920 DSP slices2,520 DSP slices
Block RAM33.6 Mb32.1 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O400304
Transceivers32 × GTX 12.5 Gb/s28 × GTH 16.3 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen2None
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm16 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages21
Design toolAMD VivadoAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The XC7K480T has about 9% more logic capacity (478K vs 438K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the XCKU9P has 2,520 DSP slices against 1,920 DSP slices on the XC7K480T.

Both have transceivers: 32 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the XC7K480T and 28 at up to 16.3 Gb/s on the XCKU9P.

The XC7K480T is designed with AMD Vivado and the XCKU9P with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XC7K480T (Kintex-7) and XCKU9P (Kintex UltraScale+).