FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

XC7VH870T vs XCKU15P

A comparison of the AMD Virtex-7 XC7VH870T and the AMD Kintex UltraScale+ XCKU15P using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

XC7VH870TXCKU15P
Vendor / familyAMD Virtex-7AMD Kintex UltraScale+
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)876,160836,800
LUTs as published547,600 LUT6523,000 LUT6
Vendor logic figure876,160 LC1,143,000 SLC
DSP2,520 DSP slices1,968 DSP slices
Block RAM49.6 Mb34.6 Mb
Large RAM—36 Mb
Max. user I/O300668
Transceivers72 × GTH 13.1 Gb/s, 16 × GTZ 28.05 Gb/s44 × GTH 16.3 Gb/s, 32 × GTY 32.75 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3Gen3 x16
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm16 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages14
Design toolAMD VivadoAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 876K and 837K LUT4 equivalents.

For arithmetic, the XC7VH870T has 2,520 DSP slices against 1,968 DSP slices on the XCKU15P.

The XCKU15P has more on-chip memory (70.6 Mb vs 49.6 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 88 at up to 28.05 Gb/s on the XC7VH870T and 76 at up to 32.75 Gb/s on the XCKU15P.

The XC7VH870T is designed with AMD Vivado and the XCKU15P with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XC7VH870T (Virtex-7) and XCKU15P (Kintex UltraScale+).