FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

XC7VX1140T vs XCKU15P

A comparison of the AMD Virtex-7 XC7VX1140T and the AMD Kintex UltraScale+ XCKU15P using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

XC7VX1140TXCKU15P
Vendor / familyAMD Virtex-7AMD Kintex UltraScale+
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)1,139,200836,800
LUTs as published712,000 LUT6523,000 LUT6
Vendor logic figure1,139,200 LC1,143,000 SLC
DSP3,360 DSP slices1,968 DSP slices
Block RAM66.1 Mb34.6 Mb
Large RAM—36 Mb
Max. user I/O1,100668
Transceivers96 × GTH 13.1 Gb/s44 × GTH 16.3 Gb/s, 32 × GTY 32.75 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3Gen3 x16
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm16 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages34
Design toolAMD VivadoAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The XC7VX1140T has about 36% more logic capacity (1139K vs 837K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the XC7VX1140T has 3,360 DSP slices against 1,968 DSP slices on the XCKU15P.

Both have transceivers: 96 at up to 13.1 Gb/s on the XC7VX1140T and 76 at up to 32.75 Gb/s on the XCKU15P.

The XC7VX1140T is designed with AMD Vivado and the XCKU15P with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XC7VX1140T (Virtex-7) and XCKU15P (Kintex UltraScale+).