FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

10AX027 vs XC6VHX250T

A comparison of the Altera Arria 10 10AX027 and the AMD Virtex-6 XC6VHX250T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

10AX027XC6VHX250T
Vendor / familyAltera Arria 10AMD Virtex-6
LUTs as published101,620 ALMs157,440 LUT6
LUT typeadaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions)6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈203,240≈251,904
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure354,000 LE251,904 LC
DSP830 variable-precision DSP blocks576 DSP48E1 slices
Block RAM14.7 Mb17.7 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O384320
Transceivers24 × XCVR 17.4 Gb/s48 × GTX 6.6 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3 x8Gen2 x8
Hard processorNoneNone
Process20 nm40 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages31
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD ISE Design Suite

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The XC6VHX250T has about 24% more logic capacity (252K vs 203K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the 10AX027 is built from ALMs and the XC6VHX250T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (102K vs 157K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the 10AX027 has 830 variable-precision DSP blocks against 576 DSP48E1 slices on the XC6VHX250T.

The XC6VHX250T has more on-chip memory (17.7 Mb vs 14.7 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 24 at up to 17.4 Gb/s on the 10AX027 and 48 at up to 6.6 Gb/s on the XC6VHX250T.

The 10AX027 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XC6VHX250T with AMD ISE Design Suite.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 10AX027 (Arria 10) and XC6VHX250T (Virtex-6).