FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

10M08 vs GW1NR-9

A comparison of the Altera MAX 10 10M08 and the Gowin LittleBee GW1NR-9 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

10M08GW1NR-9
Vendor / familyAltera MAX 10Gowin LittleBee
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)8,0008,640
LUTs as published8,000 LUT48,640 LUT4
Vendor logic figure8,000 LE— LC
DSP24 18×18 multipliers20 18×18 multipliers
Block RAM0.4 Mb0.5 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O250276
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process55 nm55 nm
Configuration memoryInternal flashEmbedded flash
Packages78
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeGowin EDA

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The GW1NR-9 has about 8% more logic capacity (8.6K vs 8K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the 10M08 has 24 18×18 multipliers against 20 18×18 multipliers on the GW1NR-9.

The GW1NR-9 has more on-chip memory (0.5 Mb vs 0.4 Mb).

Configuration memory: internal flash on the 10M08, embedded flash on the GW1NR-9.

The 10M08 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the GW1NR-9 with Gowin EDA.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 10M08 (MAX 10) and GW1NR-9 (LittleBee).