FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

5CEA7 vs XC6SLX150

A comparison of the Altera Cyclone V 5CEA7 and the AMD Spartan-6 XC6SLX150 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

5CEA7XC6SLX150
Vendor / familyAltera Cyclone VAMD Spartan-6
LUTs as published56,480 ALMs92,152 LUT6
LUT typeadaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions)6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈112,960≈147,443
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure150,000 LE147,443 LC
DSP156 variable-precision DSP blocks180 DSP48A1 slices
Block RAM6.7 Mb4.7 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O480576
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm45 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages54
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD ISE Design Suite

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The XC6SLX150 has about 31% more logic capacity (147K vs 113K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the 5CEA7 is built from ALMs and the XC6SLX150 from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (56.5K vs 92.2K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the XC6SLX150 has 180 DSP48A1 slices against 156 variable-precision DSP blocks on the 5CEA7.

The 5CEA7 has more on-chip memory (6.7 Mb vs 4.7 Mb).

The 5CEA7 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime; open source: Yosys + nextpnr-mistral (experimental) with Mistral and the XC6SLX150 with AMD ISE Design Suite.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 5CEA7 (Cyclone V) and XC6SLX150 (Spartan-6).