FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

5CGTD9 vs LFE3-150EA

A comparison of the Altera Cyclone V 5CGTD9 and the Lattice LatticeECP3 LFE3-150EA using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

5CGTD9LFE3-150EA
Vendor / familyAltera Cyclone VLattice LatticeECP3
LUTs as published113,560 ALMs149,000 LUT4
LUT typeadaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions)4-input look-up table
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈227,120≈149,000
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure301,000 LE—
DSP342 variable-precision DSP blocks320 18×18 multipliers
Block RAM11.9 Mb6.7 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O560586
Transceivers12 × XCVR 6.144 Gb/s16 × SERDES 3.2 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen2None
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm65 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages52
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeLattice Diamond

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The 5CGTD9 has about 52% more logic capacity (227K vs 149K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the 5CGTD9 is built from ALMs and the LFE3-150EA from LUT4, so the raw LUT counts (114K vs 149K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the 5CGTD9 has 342 variable-precision DSP blocks against 320 18×18 multipliers on the LFE3-150EA.

The 5CGTD9 has more on-chip memory (11.9 Mb vs 6.7 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 12 at up to 6.144 Gb/s on the 5CGTD9 and 16 at up to 3.2 Gb/s on the LFE3-150EA.

The 5CGTD9 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime; open source: Yosys + nextpnr-mistral (experimental) with Mistral and the LFE3-150EA with Lattice Diamond.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 5CGTD9 (Cyclone V) and LFE3-150EA (LatticeECP3).