FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

5CGXC4 vs XC6SLX45T

A comparison of the Altera Cyclone V 5CGXC4 and the AMD Spartan-6 XC6SLX45T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

5CGXC4XC6SLX45T
Vendor / familyAltera Cyclone VAMD Spartan-6
LUTs as published18,868 ALMs27,288 LUT6
LUT typeadaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions)6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈37,736≈43,661
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure50,000 LE43,661 LC
DSP70 variable-precision DSP blocks58 DSP48A1 slices
Block RAM2.4 Mb2 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O336296
Transceivers6 × XCVR 3.125 Gb/s4 × GTP 3.2 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen1Gen1 x1
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm45 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages53
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD ISE Design Suite

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The XC6SLX45T has about 16% more logic capacity (43.7K vs 37.7K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the 5CGXC4 is built from ALMs and the XC6SLX45T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (18.9K vs 27.3K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the 5CGXC4 has 70 variable-precision DSP blocks against 58 DSP48A1 slices on the XC6SLX45T.

The 5CGXC4 has more on-chip memory (2.4 Mb vs 2 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 6 at up to 3.125 Gb/s on the 5CGXC4 and 4 at up to 3.2 Gb/s on the XC6SLX45T.

The 5CGXC4 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime; open source: Yosys + nextpnr-mistral (experimental) with Mistral and the XC6SLX45T with AMD ISE Design Suite.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 5CGXC4 (Cyclone V) and XC6SLX45T (Spartan-6).