FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

5CGXC7 vs LFE3-95EA

A comparison of the Altera Cyclone V 5CGXC7 and the Lattice LatticeECP3 LFE3-95EA using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

5CGXC7LFE3-95EA
Vendor / familyAltera Cyclone VLattice LatticeECP3
LUTs as published56,480 ALMs92,000 LUT4
LUT typeadaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions)4-input look-up table
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈112,960≈92,000
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure150,000 LE—
DSP156 variable-precision DSP blocks128 18×18 multipliers
Block RAM6.7 Mb4.3 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O480490
Transceivers9 × XCVR 3.125 Gb/s12 × SERDES 3.2 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen1None
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm65 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages53
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeLattice Diamond

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The 5CGXC7 has about 23% more logic capacity (113K vs 92K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the 5CGXC7 is built from ALMs and the LFE3-95EA from LUT4, so the raw LUT counts (56.5K vs 92K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the 5CGXC7 has 156 variable-precision DSP blocks against 128 18×18 multipliers on the LFE3-95EA.

The 5CGXC7 has more on-chip memory (6.7 Mb vs 4.3 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 9 at up to 3.125 Gb/s on the 5CGXC7 and 12 at up to 3.2 Gb/s on the LFE3-95EA.

The 5CGXC7 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime; open source: Yosys + nextpnr-mistral (experimental) with Mistral and the LFE3-95EA with Lattice Diamond.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 5CGXC7 (Cyclone V) and LFE3-95EA (LatticeECP3).