FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

5CGXC9 vs XC6VLX195T

A comparison of the Altera Cyclone V 5CGXC9 and the AMD Virtex-6 XC6VLX195T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

5CGXC9XC6VLX195T
Vendor / familyAltera Cyclone VAMD Virtex-6
LUTs as published113,560 ALMs124,800 LUT6
LUT typeadaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions)6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈227,120≈199,680
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure301,000 LE199,680 LC
DSP342 variable-precision DSP blocks640 DSP48E1 slices
Block RAM11.9 Mb12.1 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O560600
Transceivers12 × XCVR 3.125 Gb/s20 × GTX 6.6 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen1Gen2 x8
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm40 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages52
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD ISE Design Suite

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The 5CGXC9 has about 14% more logic capacity (227K vs 200K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the 5CGXC9 is built from ALMs and the XC6VLX195T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (114K vs 125K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the XC6VLX195T has 640 DSP48E1 slices against 342 variable-precision DSP blocks on the 5CGXC9.

Both have transceivers: 12 at up to 3.125 Gb/s on the 5CGXC9 and 20 at up to 6.6 Gb/s on the XC6VLX195T.

The 5CGXC9 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime; open source: Yosys + nextpnr-mistral (experimental) with Mistral and the XC6VLX195T with AMD ISE Design Suite.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 5CGXC9 (Cyclone V) and XC6VLX195T (Virtex-6).