FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

5CSXC2 vs A3C 025

A comparison of the Altera Cyclone V 5CSXC2 and the Altera Agilex 3 A3C 025 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

5CSXC2A3C 025
Vendor / familyAltera Cyclone VAltera Agilex 3
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)18,86017,000
LUTs as published9,430 ALMs8,500 ALMs
Vendor logic figure25,000 LE25,075 LE
DSP36 variable-precision DSP blocks34 variable-precision DSP blocks
Block RAM1.4 Mb1.3 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O145256
Transceivers6 × XCVR 3.125 Gb/sNone
Hard PCI ExpressGen1None
Hard processor2× Arm Cortex-A92× Arm Cortex-A55 (optional)
Process28 nmIntel 7
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages13
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAltera Quartus Prime

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The 5CSXC2 has about 11% more logic capacity (18.9K vs 17K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the 5CSXC2 has 36 variable-precision DSP blocks against 34 variable-precision DSP blocks on the A3C 025.

Only the 5CSXC2 has multi-gigabit transceivers (6 3.125 Gb/s).

The 5CSXC2 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the A3C 025 with Altera Quartus Prime.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 5CSXC2 (Cyclone V) and A3C 025 (Agilex 3).