5M2210Z vs LCMXO2280E
A comparison of the Altera MAX V 5M2210Z and the Lattice MachXO LCMXO2280E using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| 5M2210Z | LCMXO2280E | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Altera MAX V | Lattice MachXO |
| LUTs as published | 2,210 LUT4 | 2,280 LUT4 |
| LUT type | 4-input look-up table | 4-input look-up table |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈2,210 | ≈2,280 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | — |
| Vendor logic figure | 2,210 LE | — |
| DSP | — nones | — 18×18 multipliers |
| Block RAM | — | 0 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 271 | 271 |
| Transceivers | None | None |
| Hard PCI Express | None | None |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 180 nm | 130 nm |
| Configuration memory | Internal flash | Internal flash |
| Packages | 2 | 6 |
| Design tool | Altera Quartus Prime | Lattice Diamond |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 2.2K and 2.3K LUT4 equivalents.
The 5M2210Z is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the LCMXO2280E with Lattice Diamond.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 5M2210Z (MAX V) and LCMXO2280E (MachXO).